An Industrial Engineering Evaluation and Enhancement of Value Stream Mapping

 

Sadono C. Djumin and Shahrukh A. Irani

Department of Industrial, Welding and Systems Engineering

The Ohio State University

Columbus Ohio 43210

E-mail: djumin.6@osu.edu

 

Goals

 

 

Project Motivations

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deliverables to Industry Partners

 

 

Project Timeline

 

A tentative schedule of this project is shown in the following table:

 

Necessary Tasks

Timeline

Obtain all necessary information about the current process (Product BOM, routings of components and subassemblies, demand, set-up time and processing time for each operation, travel times and material handling costs, labor and machine hour rates, inventory carrying cost rates, APR, etc.)

1-2 weeks

Develop, revise and complete the VSM map using the enhanced set of icons

2-3 weeks

Analyze the current state of the system (At this stage, interaction between the OSU team and the industry sponsor will be essential)

4-6 weeks

Brainstorm all the alternatives for process improvements

1-2 weeks

Develop and evaluate various alternatives for the future state of the system

2-4 weeks

Final presentation to industry sponsor

1 day

 


APPENDIX

 

Value Stream Mapping (VSM) is a tool that maps the value streams in a plant with the help of suitable icons to represent operations, transportation, information flows for production control and scheduling functions, WIP locations, etc. Each value stream represents the flows of a product or product families, starting from suppliers to the assembly line (or manufacturing cell) to customers. VSM uses a variety of icons to capture the current state of the facility and to suggest a future improved state of the facility. The icons are effective for recognizing value-added (VA) and non-value-added (NVA) elements in the value stream (or process flow path).  The power of VSA lies in its simplicity and its global/business emphasis that considers flows of both products and information across the entire supply chain. However, VSM is limited to high-volume assembly facilities with stable demand for one or a family of identical product variants.  It is biased towards these continuous flow environments since they are suited for Lean Manufacturing and Just-In-Time (JIT) concepts. In particular, VSM does not consider factory layout and material handling issues such as distances of travel, variety of product routings, types of material handling systems being used, various scheduling priority rules, etc. Further, unlike IE tools such as Flow Process Charting and Production Flow Analysis, it does not study the flows of resources such as consummables, fixtures, personnel, handling equipment, scrap, etc. whose utilization (and consumption) impacts the profitability of the value stream.

 

Flow Process Charting (FPC) is one of the most common IE tools for diagramming and economic valuation of delays and wastes in material or information flow processes in any manufacturing facility or office, respectively. The mapping process is uncomplicated and can be used to record every step in the flow of different entities (equipment, product, personnel, energy, paperwork, etc.) at every level of flow (workstation, cell, department, factory, supply chain, etc.) in a system. The activity symbols in the chart are the basis for analyzing and improving the efficiency of the process, based on the number of operations, moves, storage points, queuing locations, inspections and other delays experienced by the process. The chart also allows the reduction of costs by minimizing both quantity and duration of non-value adding steps, such as travel, storage, queuing and inspection. However, FPC has limitations since it tends to focus on the layout point of a facility and elimination of non-value adding steps, and ignores the importance of balancing the production rates at all value-adding operations to meet the takt time for order fulfillment determined by the customer.  Also, this traditional focus mainly on improving the material handling and layout aspects of a facility ignores the impact of information flows on timely execution of various steps in a process. Lastly, FPC lacks the icons for information flows and process improvements to generate a future state for the process.

 

Business and Office Process Charting (BOPC) is similar to FPC, except that it maps the flow of information and/or paperwork in an office (or similar service environment). However, for analysis of paperwork flows, all the standard flowcharting symbols and techniques used for FPC are used. Similar to the multi-faceted uses of Production Flow Analysis to design effective layouts for manufacturing facilities, analysis of information and paperwork flows in an office helps to evaluate and redesign the organizational structure, reporting mechanisms, building layout, functional responsibilities of various departments, etc.  The goals, methods and results of BOPC, FPC and Production Flow Analysis (PFA) are synergistic, resulting in continuous improvements in business and manufacturing processes.

 

Table 1 Symptoms of Inefficient Business Process Flows in Offices with Potential Solutions

·         Processes have high completion times Need: Create work teams dedicated to groups of processes

·         Processes have a large number of steps Need: Combine steps in the processes

·         Processes have too many manual steps Need: Automate the processes

·         Processes have multiple variants  Need: Standardize the processes

·         Space utilization in the office is inefficient Need: Develop a new office layout

·         Flows of orders and people in the office is chaotic Need: Create work teams and co-locate in “cells”

 

Process Analysis and Improvement (PA&I)

is a classical IE technique that documents the entire series of steps in a process, then seeks to improve the process by first identifying waste, irrationality and inconsistency in the steps, then identifying ways to improve one or more of the steps, then implementing the improvements that have been identified. PA&I is a component of the Seven Quality Tools and Seven Management Tools that comprise a typical Total Quality Management (TQM) or Continuous Improvement (CI) program.  Processes can be mapped using software tools, such as Visio, ABCFlowcharter or PowerPoint, and evaluated using simulation software tools such as SIMUL8 or ARENA. 

 

 



[1] Three Powerpoint presentations are being developed: (1) a summary of the Rother and Shook book on VSM, (2) a lecture module on Process Analysis & Improvement (including Flow Process Charting) and (3) a lecture module on Production Flow Analysis.